Working on integrating something by parts can be a very tedious and often confusing line to approach certain integrals. Although in many cases, it is necessary!

Previously, we have derived the formula to allow us to integrate by parts:

We can see that for any mixed integral that we come across, we would know what and is by substitution, and from then, we would have to determine and is to solve the Right hand side.

In other words, we would have to **integrate ** to obtain and **differentiate ** to obtain .

But given a particular integral, say for example, we come across our first hurdle. Which function shall we take as and ? In otherwords we can translate our problem to being:

##### **“Which is easier to differentiate?”**

and

**“Which is easier to integrate?”**

**“Which is easier to differentiate?”**

**“Which is easier to integrate?”**

To determine this, try and answer the following question:

Which is easier to determine?

or

Even with a basic understanding of derivatives, one of the first things you end up learning is that and the evaluation of is not as obvious (certainly not as simple to say the least).

Now consider the same question but this time for

Which is easier to determine?

or

In this case, we are lucky that the derivative of is itself! Also, since integration is essentially the **inverse** of differentiation, then we can equivalently say that the integral of is itself too. This makes exponentials, functions which are both easy to differentiate and to integrate!

Going back to our choices of and , since we know that is by far easier to differentiate (because is certainly not easier to integrate!) then we take and

We are not very much concerned in **what ** **evaluates to, **but rather **how ** **is evaluated.**

What if we had an integral involving and ?

Or and ?

Which function would we choose to take as and ?

It would be great if we could create a system whereby we can determine which functions to take as and .

So we ask the following question:

*Can we create an easy reference system, such that the choice of functions for and will be simplified?*

and surprisingly the answer is

**YES! We can!**

There are 4 types of functions you will normally be dealing with when doing integration.

These are:

- Algebraic (ALG)
- Exponentials (EXP)
- Logarithmic (LOG)
- Trigonometric (TRIG)

We will create our reference system focused on the choice of , since the other function will automatically be taken to be .

We shall be ranking the types of functions from left to right, the left most function that we have being the one to take as , (or the right most function as ).

We have already seen that LOG type functions are not easy to integrate, so if we have a LOG in our integral, ideally we would always like to take that as so that we may differentiate first. Thus, LOG will come first in our acronym.

**L _ _ _**

EXP functions are both easy to integrate and differentiate. Since integration usually is the headache when it comes to evaluation (differentiation is normally not very difficult in most elementary cases), if we have EXP in our integral, we would rather not pick it to be differentiated but rather save it for the more difficult option of integration! Because of this, it comes last in our acronym.

**L _ _ E**

Now ALG functions are polynomials such as and . While TRIG functions include trigonometric functions such as and (which is ). In this case, we shall choose ALG over TRIG for differentiation, not because trigonometric functions are incredibly difficult to differentiate, but rather because we might have which when differentiated, differentiates to . In this sense, ALG type functions are simpler.

**L A T E**

And there we go! Now you need not worry when you see a product of 2 different functions to integrate since you can use LATE to pick which functions are what, and simply substitute into the by parts formula!

Examples:

(ALG comes before EXP)

(TRIG comes before EXP)

(ALG comes before TRIG)

Thanks for reading!

-Sinthorel